csprimer-computersystem-concept3

NASM Tutorial hackclub/some-assembly-required: 📖 An approachable introduction to Assembly.

there is two common x64 , inter and att (linux prefer) push → pushq → push to queue

att: movq , movb (b for byte), bl → long byte

movq , q for qute word quart word → 64 bit → quart of 64 , 16

subq: substracting 16 from %rsp
operator order is difference btw att and intel
look at the construction

one text section , loaded in the memory

Programming C

learn x in y minutes C, Go - Hyperpolyglot read c code , linux source code

high level of struct
compile , c knowledge with machine

hello world in c :

int main() {} → why int a linux culture → 0 mean successful like work && run bash order

if return 1; → not , it will not run as successful, can && after

return -1 → assertion fail → fail reminder in terminal

int bitcount(int n) { int count = 0; while (n){

} }

in c , 0 mean true , 1 → false

don’t have boolean in c , so using while(n)-> keep runing while n is not 0

n & 0x01 is a bitwise AND operation that checks whether the least significant bit (LSB) of n is 1 or 0.

Explanation:

0x01 is hexadecimal for 00000001 in binary.
n & 0x01 compares n with 00000001 using bitwise AND:
- If the LSB of n is 1, the result is 1.
- If the LSB is 0, the result is 0.

Example:

n = 5;          // binary: 0101
n & 0x01 = 1    // because the LSB is 1

This is commonly used to count the number of 1s in a binary number (also known as the Hamming weight or population count).

Also, your function is missing a return statement. Here’s the corrected version:

int bitcount(int n) {
  int count = 0;
  while (n) {
    if (n & 0x01) {
      count += 1;
    }
    n >>= 1;
  }
  return count;
}

Let me know if you want a version that’s more efficient.

as there is only 1 and 0 out there , so if there is 1 in the lsb , least significant bit → shift right until 0

int bitcount(int n) { int count = 0; while (n) { count += n & 0x01; n >>= 1; } return count; }

refactor as 0 dont affect count, add them all in here lol

int main() {
assert(bitcount(0) == 0);
assert(bitcount(1) == 1);
assert(bitcount(3) == 2);
assert(bitcount(8) == 1);
// harder case:
assert(bitcount(0xffffffff) == 32);
printf("OK\n");
}

assert(bitcount(0xffffffff) == 32); this break the while(n) loop , so the n != 0 for 0xffffffff

🔢 What is `0xffffffff`?

In binary, 0xffffffff is:

11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111  // 32 bits

That’s all bits set to 1 — which equals 4294967295 in unsigned interpretation.

🧠 Signed vs Unsigned Int in C

int is signed (can represent negative and positive numbers).
It uses two’s complement representation to handle negatives.

⚙️ Two’s Complement Concept

In two’s complement, the highest bit (leftmost bit) is the sign bit:

0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx → positive
1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx → negative

To get the negative value of a binary number:

Invert all the bits
Add 1

So in 32-bit signed int:

0x00000001 → 1
0x7fffffff → 2,147,483,647 (max signed int)
0x80000000 → -2,147,483,648 (min signed int)
0xffffffff → -1

✅ Why `0xffffffff` = -1 in signed int

Let’s apply two’s complement:

0xffffffff = 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111
Invert: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
Add 1: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 → that’s 1
So original = -1

Hence, 0xffffffff is interpreted as -1 in a signed int.

🚫 Why the Loop Breaks

Right-shifting signed -1:

-1 >> 1 → still -1, because the sign bit (1) is preserved.
So n never becomes 0, and while (n) becomes infinite loop.

Summary

Hex	Binary (32-bit)	Interpreted as
`0xffffffff`	`11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111`	`-1` (signed int)
		`4294967295` (unsigned int)

So: same bits, different meaning depending on signed vs unsigned.

Let me know if you’d like a visual to reinforce this!

int bitcount(unsigned n) { int count = 0; while (n) { count += n & 0x01; n >>= 1; } return count; }

int n → unsigned → fixed

before using belew , it loop 32 times for case 0xfff … == 32

x & x-1 → deleted the rightmost bit of x using bitwise &

Excellent question — this is a classic bit manipulation trick often called Brian Kernighan’s Algorithm.

🔍 What does it do?

This line:

n &= (n - 1);

clears the lowest set bit (the rightmost 1) in n.

Each time this happens, we increment count.

So instead of looping through all 32 bits, we loop only through the number of set bits.

🔥 Why is it faster?

Let’s compare with your previous method:

Previous method:

while (n) {
  count += n & 1;
  n >>= 1;
}

Always does up to 32 iterations, checking each bit one-by-one.

New method:

while (n) {
  n &= (n - 1);
  count++;
}

Does only as many iterations as there are 1s in n.

🧠 Example: `n = 0b10110000`

Set bits: 3 Old loop → 8 iterations New loop → 3 iterations ✔️

💡 Why `n & (n - 1)` clears the lowest set bit?

Let’s take an example:

n       =  0b10110000
n - 1   =  0b10101111
---------------------
n & (n-1)= 0b10100000   ← rightmost 1 cleared

So each iteration removes one 1, getting us closer to 0 faster.

Summary:

Method	Iterations Needed	Performance Benefit
`n >>= 1`	Up to 32	Slower for sparse bits
`n &= (n-1)`	Only set bits (Hamming weight)	Faster overall

Your teacher’s version is more efficient, especially when n has few set bits. It’s a smart use of bitwise logic.

advanced C : compiler →

pop count (compiler) population count

cc -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=native -c bitcount.c

objdump -d bitcount.o

🧠 What is `popcnt`?

popcnt is a CPU instruction that counts the number of 1 bits (set bits) in a binary number.
It’s built into modern CPUs (like Intel and AMD).
It’s extremely fast — much faster than any loop.

Think of it as a “hardware-accelerated bitcount.”

✅ Why your teacher used `-march=native` and `-O3`

-O3: Tells the compiler to fully optimize the code.
-march=native: Allows the compiler to use CPU-specific features, like popcnt.

So when the compiler sees your function:

int bitcount(unsigned n) {
  int count = 0;
  while (n) {
    n &= (n-1);
    count++;
  }
  return count;
}

Instead of compiling a loop, it says:

“Oh! This is just a popcount — I’ll replace it with the popcnt instruction.”

🧩 What does the assembly mean?

0: 31 c0           xor    %eax, %eax       // set EAX = 0 (clear return value register)
2: f3 0f b8 c7     popcnt %edi, %eax       // EAX = popcount(EDI)
6: c3              ret                     // return

Let’s break it down:

Assembly	Meaning
`xor %eax, %eax`	Clear the `eax` register (set to 0)
`popcnt %edi, %eax`	Count bits in `edi` and put result in `eax`
`ret`	Return from function

Registers:

%edi: where the first argument (unsigned n) is passed (in 64-bit calling convention).
%eax: where the return value is stored.

🚀 Summary

The compiler recognized your bitcount function and replaced it with a single fast popcnt CPU instruction.
This is only possible with optimization flags (-O3 -march=native) and on CPUs that support popcnt.

So this is your teacher showing you:

“Writing clever code is cool, but modern compilers and CPUs can do even better!”

Let me know if you want a visual of how registers or popcnt work internally.

adding inline compiler wtf

#include <nmintrin.h>

__builtin_popcount(n) Counts 1-bits efficiently <nmmintrin.h> Enables SSE4.2 intrinsics like popcnt Replaces manual loop Cleaner, faster, compiler-optimized

using mechine code instruction → more optimize

as it is usign mechine instruction , not all computer have popcount , so if compile didn’t set to march = native , it will just use other assembly way

no loop in in the assembly

primer suggesting this book:

Hacker’s Delight

777-csbooks-hackers-delight

there is counting tips about bitw

Parallel way to count the bit from pair

32 → 16 → 4 → 2 pair 2 bit and sum

I am not gpt genthis right in below

Ah! If your teacher mentioned that the algorithm allows you to “run in parallel,” then he’s likely referring to an approach inspired by SIMD-style or parallel prefix sum techniques.

🧠 The Core Idea: Parallel Byte Aggregation

When decoding a multi-byte little-endian number (e.g. a4 01 00 00), the normal method is sequential:

value = b[0] + (b[1] << 8) + (b[2] << 16) + (b[3] << 24)

This is inherently sequential because each shift depends on the byte’s position.

But with parallel processing, you can:

Split the bytes into groups (e.g. 2-byte chunks)
Perform operations on those chunks in parallel
Combine the partial results later

⚡ Example: Parallel 16-bit Pairing

Let’s say you have 4 bytes:

bs = [a4, 01, 00, 00]

Instead of:

a4 + 01 << 8 + 00 << 16 + 00 << 24

You could do:

Group into 2-byte chunks:

chunk1 = a4 01  => little-endian: 0x01a4
chunk2 = 00 00  => 0x0000

Then compute:
```
value = chunk1 + (chunk2 << 16)
```

You’re now doing fewer additions, and this structure can be parallelized in low-level or SIMD hardware (e.g., SSE/AVX).

🚀 In SIMD Hardware:

On CPUs that support SIMD (like Intel with AVX), operations like “multiply and accumulate” or “shift and add” on multiple 16- or 32-bit integers can be vectorized, meaning done in parallel registers.

Even in GPU programming (CUDA, OpenCL), this matters.

🧪 Summary:

Your teacher is hinting at an algorithm that makes endian conversion more parallel-friendly:

Feature	Explanation
✅ Break into 2-byte chunks	Reduces loop iterations
✅ SIMD-friendly	You can shift/add in parallel lanes
✅ More efficient for large arrays	Works well in image or video data
✅ CPU/GPU optimization	Used in compilers and video codecs

🧰 Python can’t truly do this in parallel, but…

You could simulate the logic and understand how it reduces dependency per byte.

Want me to show you this idea with an example that compares standard vs 2-byte parallel-style summing in Python?

Ah! You’re thinking of Divide and Conquer algorithms. (That’s the correct spelling 😊)

🧠 What Is a Divide and Conquer Algorithm?

Divide and Conquer is a strategy to solve complex problems by:

Divide — Breaking the problem into smaller subproblems.
Conquer — Solving each subproblem recursively (or in parallel).
Combine — Merging the solutions of subproblems to get the final answer.

✅ Classic Examples

Problem	How Divide & Conquer Works
Merge Sort	Divide the array, sort both halves recursively, then merge the sorted halves
Quick Sort	Partition the array, then sort left and right parts recursively
Binary Search	Divide search space in half each time
Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)	Split signals, apply FFT recursively, then combine frequency results
Matrix Multiplication (Strassen)	Break matrix into quadrants, multiply submatrices recursively

🧮 For Byte Summing?

Yes — your teacher might be suggesting a Divide and Conquer approach to summing bytes, like:

Pair 2 bytes together and form small integers
Sum pairs recursively
Combine results

This lets you parallelize the summing, especially if:

You’re reading huge binary files
You’re processing pixels or data blocks
You’re optimizing for SIMD/CPU threads

👇 In simple Python example:

def le_dc(bs):  # Divide and Conquer for little-endian bytes
    if len(bs) == 1:
        return bs[0]
    mid = len(bs) // 2
    left = le_dc(bs[:mid])
    right = le_dc(bs[mid:])
    return left + (right << (8 * mid))

Same result as the loop-based method, but this can be done in parallel in theory, because left and right are independent until the final shift + add.

Would you like a visual animation or simple diagram of how this divide-and-conquer version works compared to normal summing?

primer mention : What Is a Divide and Conquer Algorithm?

Divide and Conquer is a strategy to solve complex problems by:

Divide — Breaking the problem into smaller subproblems.

Conquer — Solving each subproblem recursively (or in parallel).

Combine — Merging the solutions of subproblems to get the final answer.

Recent Writing

20250513-csprimer-computersystem-concept3